Showing posts with label Jordan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jordan. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

More anti-Semitic hypocrisy

Greetings.

Jewish date:  Jewish date:  16 ’Av 5770 (Parashath ‘Eqev).

Today’s holidays:  Tuesday of the Seventeenth Week of Ordinary Time (Roman Catholicism), Feast Day of St. Madonna (Church of the SubGenius), Mid-Sha'ban (Islam).

Worthy causes of the day:  “Save BioGems: Take Action: Protect the Redrock Wilderness” and “Shine Sunlight on Election Spending”.

Topic 1:  More anti-Semitism:  “Gaza, attack on modernity” deals with how the Gaza Strip is going Islamist, the very sort of thing that people pushing for freedom should be fighting against.  “Palestinian Corruption and Foreign Aid” deals with where all the aid money going to the “Palestinians” is actually going, and it is not doing anything to better their lives:

Olympia Food Co-Op Boycotts Israeli Goods, Gaza Mall Doesn't” notes an obvious irony.  “Mad Dog Englishmen” rails against the ruling in a recent court case in England; five men caused $275,000 in damages to an arms factory but got off scot-free because the factory was providing arms for the Israel Defense Force; such a ruling is not only anti-Semitic, but also uses “the ends justify the means” reasoning, which can be used to rationalize practically any crime and thus is invalid.  “Palestinians oppose ending the occupation” notes an inconsistency in the claims of the “Palestinians”:  they hate Israel and want it completely off what they consider their land, to the point of committing acts of terrorism against Israel, but they want Israel to be completely responsible for them.  Thus the “Palestinians” cannot ever let the “occupation” ever end, since that would mean that they would have no excuse to claim anything from Israel or to attack Israel.  It other words, if they want to keep getting stuff for free, they have to continue being pathetic losers in the game of conquest.  (Insult to the terrorists intended.)  “Jordan, Dr. Peace and Mr. Apartheid” notes the rotten way “Palestinians” are treated in Jordan, noting the hypocrisy involved.

Topic 2:  For today’s religious humor, in which Basement Cat finds something new evil to do: “Wheres”:
funny pictures of cats with captions

Peace.

Aaron
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, June 25, 2010

Theological review of Mort and Sourcery (The Discworld Series, books 4 and 5)

Greetings.

Jewish date:  13 Tammuz 5770 (Parashath Balaq).

Today’s holidays:  Friday of the Twelfth Week of Ordinary Time (Roman Catholicism), Feast Day of St. Ed Gein (Church of the SubGenius).




Topic 1:  Mort and Sourcery (The Discworld Series, books 4 and 5) by Terry Pratchett.

WARNING:  MASSIVE SPOILERS BELOW.  THOSE NOT WISHING TO BE SPOILED ARE ADVISED TO PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO TOPIC 2.

Mort is the more overtly religious of the two books, building upon the character of Death and his domain.  (And because much of what happens in this book is connected with Death, this is going to be a long, nontrivial review.)  Death’s domain is elaborated beyond parts of a building which Rincewind and Twoflower saw to include a surrounding area including a garden, moors, and mountains, only all in black.  Death created his domain, and it did not come out quite right.  Everything is only an imitation of the real thing, e.g., the mountains are fuzzy up close.  Even the time of Death’s domain is fake, as Death’s adopted daughter Ysabell has remained 16 for 35 years there, and his servant Albert has remained something like 91 for about 2,000 years.  The job of Death is also elaborated on.  There is an hourglass for everyone on the Discworld, and when the sand in the hourglass runs out, their soul needs to be removed with a special scythe.  (Keep in mind that the Death of Discworld is essentially the Grim Reaper, though the classic Grim Reaper does not ride around on a horse named “Binky”.)

In this book, Death takes on an apprentice by the name of Mort, who in his teens and something of a bookworm.  Ysabell correctly notes it makes no sense for Death to have an apprentice; it is not as if Death is going to die and need a replacement.  Nevertheless, Death trains Mort in his job of collecting the souls anyway, and there are strong hints that Mort is meant to also keep Ysabell company.  (She has Death, Albert, and some horses for company, no one particularly like her, so she is very lonely.)

Mort has moral qualms about his new job.  He is horrified to learn that when one dies, one experiences what one expects will happen to him/her.  E.g., if one believes one will go to Heaven, one goes to Heaven.  If one believes one will be reincarnated, one is reincarnated.  And if one believes one will go to Hell—well, you get the picture.  Mort decries this as unfair.  Though considering the power of belief on the Discworld (though not our own world), this does make sense.  And hold on to the notion of belief creating reality, because we will be dealing with it again in a moment.

Also problematic to Mort is how death is parceled out.  Death knows whose souls to take by reading the Nodes (or something like that) and checking hourglasses.  Who lives and dies is handed down from the Discworld gods, and whether anyone actually deserves to die apparently does not figure into it.  And this causes trouble for Mort.  When he is sent to collect the soul of Princess Keli of Sto Lat, he collects the soul of her would-be assassin instead.  In doing so, he splits reality in two.  In most of the Discworld, Keli is dead and the evil Duke has succeeded to the throne; but in Sto Lat, Keli still lives—sort of.

Though Keli is still breathing, eating, and moving about, everyone around her is in a state of confusion; left to themselves, they feel that someone important is dead and will act on it, and they will even act unaware of Keli’s existence, but they are not completely oblivious to her.  Keli consults the 20-year-old wizard Igneous Cutwell, who is probably the only one around who is not oblivious to her, and he is able to divine through the Discworld equivalent of tarot cards and I Ching her situation.  Refusing to simply live with being dead (so to speak), Keli charges Cutwell with the office of Royal Recognizer; his duty is to fix things so that everyone recognizes her as alive.  Knowing the power of belief, Cutwell unleashes a propaganda campaign, with images of Keli everywhere, hoping that by convincing people he can stabilize the local reality with Keli as being alive.  Only his success is mixed, and the bubble of local reality is shrinking.  Keli thus charges Cutwell with the task of officially crowning her queen before the bubble collapses completely, even though he has to highly abbreviate the ceremony, including forcing the half-blind high priest to rush through sacrificing an elephant to do so.  (And the elephant only gets a flesh wound on the trunk and escapes, so rest assured that no elephants were killed in the telling of this story.)

Mort has his own problems.  He has a crush on Keli and wants to save her, but Death has disappeared and someone needs to do his job—and Mort dares not not do “the Duty”.  (Ysabell and Albert would never let him.)  His solution to the moral dilemma is to do the Duty with Ysabell’s help and hope he can reach Sto Lat in time to do anything to save Keli.  In doing the Duty, Mort increasingly takes aspects of Death upon himself, in some aspect actually becoming Death.  Mort and Ysabell do arrive before the bubble collapse.  They try to stabilize the bubble through belief, appointing Cutwell a priest and having him crown Keli, but to no avail.  In the end, all four of them escape to Death’s domain on Binky.

In the meantime, Albert (previously the great wizard Alberto Malich) returns to Unseen University and terrifies the wizards there into helping him perform the Rite of AshkEnte, which summons Death away from his new job as a chef(!) and back to his actual job.  Death, being the magically reified personification of death, came into existence when the first living thing came into existence, and he will exist until no one is left and there is nothing else to do but (so to speak) to put the chairs up on the tables and turn out the lights.  This is a grim future for the Grim Reaper, and thus he hoped to escape it—or at least get a vacation from it—through becoming more human.  (One may quibble about whether being the last being left alive or dying earlier is better; this is arguably just a matter of taste.  But despair at the idea is quite understandable.)

Death, when he returns to his domain, is, of course, angry.  Thus he and Mort fight in the (very large) room full of hourglasses.  Every time an hourglass breaks, someone dies; Ysabell, Keli, and Cutwell thus work hard to save whatever hourglasses they can from being smashed.  Death gloats that Mort cannot win; even the Discworld gods are subject to him.  (And in this respect the Discworld gods are clearly of a very inferior sort of deity.  Discworld theology seems to be designed for humor, not to necessarily reflect any particular real religion.)  And the sand in Mort’s hourglass is running out.  Death regrets that he must kill Mort, but Mort claims he understands.  And then, as the last grain of sand in Mort’s hourglass runs out, there is a surprise twist in the plot:  Death turns the hourglass upside-down. And this makes sense:  if he is above the gods, then has to answer to no one for tampering with reality.  If he wants Mort to continue to live, Mort will continue to live, because no one can stop him.

Tampering with reality is not limited to Mort continuing to live.  Keli’s fate is also altered so that she lives—and the gods agree to this, being reportedly sentimental and just—though she must now unite the Sto region as the Duke was originally supposed to do.  (The Duke died when his hourglass was broken in the fight between Death and Mort, so he is no longer a threat.)  Mort and Ysabell also have their fate changed; they leave Death’s domain, get married, and become the Duke and Duchess of Sto Helit.  In short:  while there is fate on the Discworld, it is not immutable.

It also turns out the attempt to alter reality, independently of Death or the gods, was somewhat successful.  Death gives Mort and Ysabell a “pearl of reality” formed by the attempt.  This may become a full-fledged universe at some point.

The theology in Sourcery is more subtle.  The eighth son of an eighth son on the Discworld is a wizard.  Wizards are supposed to be celibate, and the reason for this having nothing to do with sex being bad for magic.  (Which may be good news for such implied pairings as Simon with Esk and Cutwell with Keli, should they figure this out.)  Rather, the eighth son of a wizard is a sourcerer.  Sourcery is a much more basic and powerful sort of magic than wizardry or witchcraft.  And we find out just why wizards did whatever they could to prevent the second coming of sourcery when outcast wizard Ipslore the Red marries and has eight sons, the eighth, Coin, naturally being a sourcerer.  Soon after Coin’s birth, Death comes for Ipslore—as he comes personally for all wizards—but Ipslore escapes Death temporarily by transferring his essence to his octiron staff.  Ipslore intends to instruct Coin from within the staff and make it that Coin will become Archchancellor of Unseen University and “show the world its true destiny, and there will be no magic greater than his.”  Death objects to predestination; there must be a way out of this fate somehow.  (Remember that in the previous book the judgement was that fate is not perfectly predestined, so Pratchett is being consistent.)  Ipslore reluctantly agrees.

Ten years later, Coin comes marching in to Unseen University with powers beyond anything that wizards have.  He takes over and subjugates and destroys anyone who stands in his way.  He is so powerful that he takes over Ankh-Morpork and magically renovates the entire city.  Furthermore, he wants to become Archchancellor.  Soon ambient magic levels rise sharply.  Every wizard becomes much more powerful.  Great towers start going up, and the wizards in the towers start fighting each other, wreaking enormous destruction.  Coin even dares to imprison the Discworld gods in a pearl of reality.  With the gods gone, the Four Horsemen of the Apocralypse gather together at a bar, and the Ice Giants decide the end of the world has come and start riding their herds of glaciers over everything they can.  Everything seems grim.

There is a complication to Coin’s plans.  To properly become Archchancellor, one needs the official Archchancellor’s hat.  The hat, which has absorbed something of the magic and personality of its previous owners, calls out to be stolen by Ankh-Morpork’s greatest thief:  Conina, daughter of Cohen the Barbarian, would-be hairdresser, and plausibly inspiration for Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Xena, Warrior Princess.  Conina not only steals the hat, but soon teams up (more or less) with the massively incompetent wizard Rincewind to get the hat to far-away Al Khali and away from Coin.  After some adventuring, they get to Al Khali, where the Seriph Creosote throws Rincewind in a snake pit and Conina in his harem.  In the snake pit Rincewind finds (unsurprisingly) a snake and Nijel the Destroyer.  Nijel is a barbarian hero-wannabe who is only slightly more skilled at being a barbarian hero than Rincewind is at being a wizard.  Conina’s experience in the harem is a parody of One Thousand and One Arabian Nights, with Creosote trying to get Conina to tell him a story.  (Sorry, not the stuff one expects to happen in a harem.)  Creosote also has a tendency to (try to) flatter women in poetic language which sounds like something from Song of Songs or The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam; Conina, who is frequently on the receiving end of the compliments, finds this annoying.  Also out of One Thousand and One Arabian Nights are a magic lamp (with an incredibly useless genie) and a flying carpet.  FYI:  make sure your flying carpet is right-side-up before using it; otherwise you will have to order it to go down in order to make it go up.  But I digress.

The Apocralypse does not come, not in the least because Conina, Nijel, and Creosote steal the horses of Pestilence, Famine, and War, leaving them stranded at the bar since Death does not want all four of them riding on Binky.  Conina and Nijel face off against the Ice Giants and their glaciers.  They do not really think that they have any chance of winning, but rather Nijel believes (despite all evidence to the contrary) that he really is a barbarian hero, and a real barbarian hero would never back down from a fight, no matter how hopeless it seems.  Their fight with the frozen foe never comes (though they do get a beautiful moment together), because of the actions of an even more unlikely hero:  Rincewind.  (I don’t make this silliness up.  I just comment on it.)  Rincewind, arriving at Unseen University on the flying carpet.  Rincewind attacks the octiron staff, managing to drive a wedge between the spirit of Ipslore and Coin and toss himself and Coin into the Dungeon Dimensions.  Death finally manages to collect Ipslore’s soul.  In the Dungeon Dimensions, Rincewind manages to send back Coin with the pearl of reality containing the gods, who put an end to the terror of the Ice Giants once released.  (Major rule of theology:  no one messes with the gods and gets away with it.)

Coin, realizing he is too powerful for the Discworld, leaves for a universe of his own creation.  Rincewind remains trapped in the Dungeon Dimensions, but I strongly doubt that Pratchett would allow such a great character to remain there indefinitely.

Next up:  The Wyrd Sisters (The Discworld Series, book 6).

Topic 2:  About a weeks worth of commentary on anti-Semitism (and I will lay off of this topic when the anti-Semites learn to shut up and stop blaming the Jews for everything wrong with the world):  1) The Dry Bones cartoons “Media Attention”, “Piracy”, and “Independent Women - the Dry Bones Blog”.  (Enjoy the irony.)  2) From HonestReporting:  “Behind Bars: Photo Bias Breaks Out of Gaza”, “Will the Media Remember Gilad Shalit?”, and “Scenes From the World's Biggest Concentration Camp”.  3) Assorted other people getting mad:  “An open letter to President Obama from Jon Voight - Washington Times”, “Geert Wilders: Change Jordan's name to Palestine” (which works historically, since Mandatory Palestine started off including what is now Jordan), “Weathering the approaching storm”, and “Joyce Kaufman. The 7 Reasons to Support Israel.”:


Topic 3:  Arguably creeping Islamization here in the United States, and yes, this is definitely against the Constitution:  “Dearborn Police: Defending Islam against the Constitution”:


Topic 4:  For today’s religious humor: “The battle between good and evil.”:
funny pictures of cats with captions

Peace and Shabbath shalom.

Aaron
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, January 18, 2010

Jordan is a sore loser, and something fishy happened in the trial of Paul Shanley

Greetings.

Jewish date:  3 Shevaṭ 5770 (Parashath Bo’).

Today’s holiday:  Monday of the Second Week of Ordinary Time (Roman Catholicism).




Topic 1:  “Anything but Jewish”:  This post does a good job covering the recent claim made by Jordan that it owns the Dead Sea Scrolls and severely criticizes an article by Daoud Kuttab rationalizing that the Scrolls are Jordanian/“Palestinian” and as much Christian and Islamic as Jewish.  Who wrote the Scrolls?  Jews.  Were there Christians, Muslims, Jordanians, and “Palestinians” alive when the Scrolls were written?  No.  Where were the Scrolls found?  Qumran, in what is now Israeli territory.  How attached have Muslims and Christians been to the Scrolls?  They wanted to make them into sandals and sold them for profit.  Not to mention there is the persistent issue which Muslim countries always gloss over:  if you attack another country without provocation (and merely existing is not a provocation) and you lose anything, it is no longer yours.  That is the way war works.  The Scrolls are Jewish and in Israeli hands, and if the Jordanians do not like it, then it is their problem.

Topic 2:  I am very confused by this article:  “Mass. court denies ex-priest's bid for new trial”.  The Catholic ex-priest in question, Paul Shanley, was convicted on the basis of “repressed memories” claiming abuse 20 years ago.  This is very disturbing because repressed memory therapy does not actually recover memories not conscious remembered; it creates memories of things that did not happen by building upon or altering existing memories or fabricating them from scratch.  Because “repressed memories” are false, people believing they are true can hurt individuals, families, and communities by making damaging accusations.  Families have been destroyed and innocent people thrown in jail because of “repressed memories”.  I therefore assumed that Shanley is totally innocent of the charges.  But then I noticed this paragraph near the end:
Shanley, now 78, was known in the 1960s and 1970s as a "street priest" who reached out to Boston's troubled youth. Internal records showed that church officials were aware of sexual abuse complaints against him as early as 1967.
More digging turned up this paragraph (including a reference) in the Wikipedia article on him:
According to Leon Podles in his book Sacrilege: Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church, "In late 1993, Shanley was sent to the Institute of Living in Hartford, Connecticut, for evaluation. The Boston archdiocese has refused to release this evaluation, but other released files show that Shanley admitted to nine sexual encounters, of which four involved boys, and that he was diagnosed as 'narcissistic' and 'histrionic'. Shanley admitted that he was 'attracted to adolescents' and on the basis of this confession, the Boston archdiocese secretly settled several lawsuits against Shanley. The archdiocese of Boston in 1993 had to admit to the diocese of San Bernardino part of the truth about Shanley, and the bishop of San Bernardino immediately dismissed him."
So…  If this information is correct, then Shanley is an admitted pedophile.  Presumably there is something more than hearsay and mere accusation going on here since he admitted something happened.  Even if he lied and did not do the crimes (which, strangely enough, people occasionally do), something must have happened to make him do so.  If one is going to convict someone of a crime, one wants to do it on the strongest possible evidence.  So why was Shanley convicted on completely invalid evidence when presumably there is something more substantial out there?  Something fishy is going on here; that’s for sure.

Topic 3:  For today’s religious humor:  “Basement cat pozing fur movie posterz”:
funny pictures of cats with captions

Peace.

Aaron
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]